Category Archives: Associational Discrimination

January 25, 2011 by Dorsey & Whitney

On January 24, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP, No. 09-291. The Court unanimously (8-0, with Justice Kagan recusing herself) reversed the 10-6 en banc decision from the Sixth Circuit. The Supreme Court held that Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision reached a Charging Party’s fiancé. The decision’s significant practical ramifications are discussed at the conclusion of this article.

Background Facts

The facts of this case are straightforward. The defendant company, North American Stainless (NAS) terminated one of its employees, Miriam Regalado. She filed a Charge of Discrimination with the EEOC, claiming that she had been discharged on the basis of gender in violation of Title VII’s prohibition against sex discrimination. Three weeks after Regalado filed her Charge, NAS also terminated her fiancé, Eric Thompson. Thompson then independently filed a Charge of Discrimination with the EEOC, claiming that he was a victim of retaliatory conduct by NAS. Answer→

October 13, 2008 by Dorsey & Whitney

Quirky Question # 62:

Your pending question regarding the “temporal proximity” required for retaliation claims is interesting.  I have a slightly different question, also involving retaliation claims.

What is the scope of the protections provided by retaliation provisions.  For example, if one member of a couple, both of whom worked for us, sues us for discrimination in connection with her discharge, could we fire her husband?  We think it would be a weird dynamic to employ the spouse of someone who is suing us.  Similarly, if we terminated an individual and he later sued us for discrimination, could we refuse to hire his adult children if they sought employment with our company? Answer→